<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>The Reel Deal &#187; Knocked Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reeldealblog.com/category/knocked-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reeldealblog.com</link>
	<description>Your source for movies and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2018 20:14:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/6.0" mode="simple" -->
	<itunes:summary>Your source for movies and more!</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>The Reel Deal</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://reeldealblog.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Your source for movies and more!</itunes:subtitle>
	
	<item>
		<title>Five Movies That Are Often Misinterpreted By People</title>
		<link>http://reeldealblog.com/2014/01/five-movies-that-are-often-misinterpreted-by-people/</link>
		<comments>http://reeldealblog.com/2014/01/five-movies-that-are-often-misinterpreted-by-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ian0592]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jordan Belfort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knocked Up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Scorsese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxi Driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Graduate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wolf of Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeldealblog.com/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hottest controversy right now surrounds “The Wolf of Wall Street” and whether or not the film makes Jordan Belfort look like a hero or a villain. Okay, maybe this debate is a week old but I don’t get paid to do this so relevance is irrelevant here. Anyway, “The Wolf of Wall Street” is [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-hMyNhzpldQo/Us3Mkz7DU6I/AAAAAAAACeU/OCoZD8NQKBA/s1600/Wolf-of-Wall-Street-Quaaludes-scene-sequence.jpg"><img class="alignleft" style="border: 0px;" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-hMyNhzpldQo/Us3Mkz7DU6I/AAAAAAAACeU/OCoZD8NQKBA/s1600/Wolf-of-Wall-Street-Quaaludes-scene-sequence.jpg" width="320" height="224" border="0" /></a></div>
<p>The hottest controversy right now surrounds “The Wolf of Wall Street” and whether or not the film makes Jordan Belfort look like a hero or a villain. Okay, maybe this debate is a week old but I don’t get paid to do this so relevance is irrelevant here.</p>
<div>Anyway, “The Wolf of Wall Street” is not the first film to face this problem. Watching movies is such a subjective experience that they get misunderstood all of the time. Sometimes, this can be a good thing and it can bring up issues that nobody talks about, like how to view people who somehow make taking Quaaludes and snorting cocaine look hilarious. Other times, it can show how dumb people are, such as those who root for Jordan Belfort. Other times, misinterpretation can be dangerous when the irony is lost and life imitates art.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Here are five other movies that often get misinterpreted:</div>
<div><span id="more-5"></span></div>
<p><!-- more --></p>
<div><b>The Graduate (1967)</b></div>
<div></div>
<div>“The Graduate” contains a gloriously false happy ending. Ben Braddock (Dustin Hoffman) spends the whole film sleeping with Elaine Robinson’s (Katharine Ross) mother, and then decides that maybe he wants Elaine instead. So he crashes her wedding and they ride off on a bus together. Happily ever after? After just a minute, their two smiles quickly begin to fade in the shortest honeymoon phase known to man. “The Graduate” shows that impulsive love doesn’t normally work out. Generations of rom-coms to come always managed to get this ending wrong. The common misinterpretation of this ending is used as a key plot point in “500 Days of Summer.”</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><b>Taxi Driver (1976) </b></div>
<div></div>
<div>“Wolf” isn’t the first time that somebody has gotten one of Scorsese’s films wrong. “Taxi Driver” is one of cinema’s most haunting and ambiguous works of art. Excuse me while I go hit myself in the head with a hammer after writing that sentence. Anyway, the disturbed Travis Bickle (Robert De Niro) shoots up an entire army of pimps in his efforts to save a teenage prostitute. Yes, he saves a young girl’s life, but in the process he becomes one of the maniacs that he hates. In the end, newspapers declare him a hero and he evades jail time. Some might believe this is how we should actually feel about him, while others find it ironic that a psychopath would be venerated by the media. In an even more extreme case, John Hinckley Jr. was inspired by the film and attempted to assassinate Ronald Regan. Sometimes, misinterpretation leaves the realm of silly intellectual debate and turns into something much more frightening.</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><b>Wall Street (1987) </b></div>
<div></div>
<div>“Greed, for lack of a better word, is good.” This is the most famous quote from “Wall Street,” and many people took it as a life philosophy as opposed to a stern warning. The Gordon Gekko case is a failure of irony. Then again, I would probably trust anybody with a cell phone that awesome. Fittingly, one of the many people inspired by “greed is good” happened to be an idealistic young stock broker named Jordan Belfort.</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><b>Knocked Up/Juno (2007) </b></div>
<div></div>
<div>Both of these comedies from 2007 explore unexpected pregnancies and in both there is a key scene where a character decides to keep the baby instead of getting an abortion. Immediately, many conservatives hailed the film as strongly pro-life, showing that political people never miss out on a single chance to push their agendas. Rather, their decisions were necessary for the films. If Juno and Alison had opted to get abortions, then both “Knocked Up” and “Juno” would have been over within 20 minutes.</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><b>Tropic Thunder (2008) </b></div>
<div></div>
<div>The funniest scene in a very funny movie comes when method actor Kirk Lazarus (Robert Downey Jr.) explains to action star Tugg Speedman (Ben Stiller) that if you want to win an Oscar, then you “never go full retard.” Some considered this an assault on the mentally challenged, and protests ensued. It is unfortunate that many saw this joke to be a malicious one, as it is really pointing its finger at actors who try and exploit disabilities. Funny, nobody ever got worked up over the fact that Robert Downey Jr. is wearing blackface for nearly the entire duration of &#8220;Tropic Thunder.&#8221;</div>
<div></div>
<p><!--EndFragment--></p>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reeldealblog.com/2014/01/five-movies-that-are-often-misinterpreted-by-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review: This Is 40</title>
		<link>http://reeldealblog.com/2012/12/movie-review-this-is-40/</link>
		<comments>http://reeldealblog.com/2012/12/movie-review-this-is-40/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ian0592]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Albert Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Lithgow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judd Apatow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knocked Up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leslie Mann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This is 40]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeldealblog.com/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comedies aren&#8217;t supposed to be over two hours long. Then again, Judd Apatow is a very ambitious guy. He likes to let his camera run long, and he doesn&#8217;t shut it off until he feels like he&#8217;s ready to shut it off. &#8220;This Is 40,&#8221; which clearly comes from a very personal place, at first [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-QGloJZGKIyg/UNinaL9puHI/AAAAAAAAB5I/QV16sWLhXtg/s1600/o-THIS-IS-40-570.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" height="172" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-QGloJZGKIyg/UNinaL9puHI/AAAAAAAAB5I/QV16sWLhXtg/s320/o-THIS-IS-40-570.jpg" width="320"></a></div>
<p>Comedies aren&#8217;t supposed to be over two hours long. Then again, Judd Apatow is a very ambitious guy. He likes to let his camera run long, and he doesn&#8217;t shut it off until he feels like he&#8217;s ready to shut it off. &#8220;This Is 40,&#8221; which clearly comes from a very personal place, at first made me want to check my watch. However, once the credits began to roll, I realized that I wouldn&#8217;t have minded if it ran a little longer.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is 40&#8243; is a &#8220;sort-of sequel&#8221; to &#8220;Knocked Up.&#8221; It would be better labeled as a spinoff, a title which is usually reserved for television. It takes the struggling married couple Pete (Paul Rudd) and Debbie (Leslie Mann) and their two daughters Sadie (Maude Apatow) and Charlotte (Iris Apatow) and puts them into their own little world. Pete desperately finds ways to escape. He&#8217;s given up on his fantasy baseball league and seems more content sitting on the toilet with his iPad. Debbie, meanwhile, is fed up with feeling under appreciated and keeping everything together on her own. Naturally, this causes some problems.</p>
<p><!-- more --><br />Yet, despite all their problems, what makes &#8220;This Is 40&#8243; unique is that I never doubted for one second that Pete and Debbie weren&#8217;t right for each other. &#8220;This is 40&#8243; is more about unfortunate speed bumps than the absolute deterioration of a marriage. It takes place on the week that Debbie turns 38 (although everyone treats her like she&#8217;s 40) and Pete turns 40. This begins what many in Hollywood would call a midlife crisis.</p>
<div><img height="225" src="http://brightcove.vo.llnwd.net/e1/pd/44692000001/44692000001_1778664976001_ThisIs40-TRL2-01-dvcpro-hd.jpg?pubId=44692000001" width="400"></div>
<p>I never found &#8220;This Is 40&#8243; to be a film about people drifting apart. Rather, its about two people who want to be closer together finding ways to get closer together. &#8220;This is 40&#8243; is about the modern family struggling to grow and remain close in a very wired world of cell phones and tablets. It&#8217;s the same thing that &#8220;Modern Family&#8221; tries to do, except &#8220;This is 40&#8243; doesn&#8217;t have Ed O&#8217;Neill repeatedly telling us how much he loves his family. I have not reached the age of 40 yet, but I can tell that &#8220;This is 40&#8243; comes from a very real place. It has absolutely no problem showing us the bad as well as the good.</p>
<p>While &#8220;This Is 40&#8243; is not my favorite Judd Apatow film, it is definitely his most mature, and his most lovely made to date. Yet, maturity does not mean that he eschews vulgarity. It has a hefty load of what I like to call &#8220;butt stuff.&#8221; One scene that has been frequently discussed is one in which Debbie is forced to look at Pete&#8217;s butt because he thinks there&#8217;s a problem. It&#8217;s a scene that shows both the sparks of a marriage that has faded away and the unconditional love that remains. There is also a less talked about scene where Pete lets one rip. The moment was unscripted. It&#8217;s hilarious and it&#8217;s a fine example of the loose and spontaneous feeling of the film.</p>
<p>Often, &#8220;This Is 40&#8243; feels less like a story and more like life unfolding before our eyes. It is one of the more unconventional mainstream comedies you&#8217;ll see nowadays. It refuses to settle for the usual plot beats, and it doesn&#8217;t try and immediately ruin happy moments with sad ones. Judd has a great talent for knowing when to be funny and when to be sad at just the right times. It was something he tried to do in &#8220;Funny People,&#8221; but had much less success with. You can tell that someone has become confident in their comedic abilities when they know that it is okay to go for an extended period of time without a laugh.</p>
<div><img height="265" src="http://0.tqn.com/d/movies/1/0/B/P/Z/this-is-40-maude-apatow.jpg" width="400"></div>
<p>Even if SAG didn&#8217;t recognize it, &#8220;This Is 40&#8243; has one of the best ensembles of the year. Every cast member participates in what I would like to call &#8220;confessional acting.&#8221; As Pete and Debbie, Mann and Rudd are so convincing as this married couple. Even though I felt that the film was running a little long during the third act, I was surprised to find myself teary eyed (not from boredom) by the end. The extra running time made them into real people, and their performances hit that point out of the park. Also impressive is the oldest Apatow daughter, who has a way with words and emotions at such a young age. And to no one&#8217;s surprise, Albert Brooks is perfect as a bitter old Jewish man.</p>
<p>Like every good project Judd has worked on, &#8220;This Is 40&#8243; is special because of its great display of empathy. It makes us dislike our characters when they are acting based on their most flawed instincts, and it makes us like them when they overcome and change. By the end of the film, Pete and Debbie don&#8217;t necessarily change who they are, but rather they learn to embrace what they have, and what they can become. The greatest thing that can happen to an Apatow character is when they gain a sense of self-awareness.</p>
<p>As the film began, I almost thought I wasn&#8217;t watching an Apatow film. He has embraced a quieter, more artistic sense of filmmaking, which I am rather enjoying. The opening felt like a Wes Anderson film, but with less thick-rimmed glasses and Kinks songs. But even as Apatow changes, the best parts of his works doesn&#8217;t disappear. Even as Pete and Debbie battle financial troubles and deteriorating health, characters still manage to get into fights about &#8220;Lost&#8221; and &#8220;Mad Men&#8221; and talk about how they pee &#8220;like a shower head.&#8221;</p>
<p>The characters that Judd portrays are getting older and older as his career progresses, yet he luckily hasn&#8217;t abandoned his distinct style of humor. While it is called &#8220;This Is 40,&#8221; you don&#8217;t have to be that enjoy to enjoy this film. When you laugh at something as hard as I laughed at parts of &#8220;This Is 40,&#8221; there is no use in questioning it.  </p>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img height="281" src="http://www.indiewire.com/static/dims4/INDIEWIRE/df278cd/4102462740/thumbnail/680x478/http://d1oi7t5trwfj5d.cloudfront.net/af/78e1b0327a11e29c5422000a1d0930/file/Megan-Fox,-Leslie-Mann,-This-Is-40.jpg" width="400"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>If this scene doesn&#8217;t help &#8220;This Is 40&#8243; earn over $100 million, then there is no hope for America anymore.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reeldealblog.com/2012/12/movie-review-this-is-40/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Thoughts on Funny People</title>
		<link>http://reeldealblog.com/2009/08/more-thoughts-on-funny-people/</link>
		<comments>http://reeldealblog.com/2009/08/more-thoughts-on-funny-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 23:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ian0592]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aubrey Plaza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aziz Ansari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funny People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Schwartzman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonah Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judd Apatow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knocked Up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leslie Mann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Rogen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeldealblog.com/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an unofficial second review of Funny People. Some movies are just so big, they need to be reviewed twice. Usually, once I review a film, it&#8217;s done. But sometimes, I am so conflicted over a film that I can&#8217;t help but go back to it. This happened with &#8220;Funny People.&#8221; Critical consensus is [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ok1ftQfHwrg/SneUPmp6ToI/AAAAAAAAAaM/jc01IxMSSjc/s1600-h/judd_apatow_adam_sandler_eric_bana_seth_rogen_leslie_mann_funny_people_movie_image.jpg"><img alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ok1ftQfHwrg/SneUPmp6ToI/AAAAAAAAAaM/jc01IxMSSjc/s200/judd_apatow_adam_sandler_eric_bana_seth_rogen_leslie_mann_funny_people_movie_image.jpg" border="0"></a><span>This is an unofficial second review of Funny People. Some movies are just so big, they need to be reviewed twice.</span>
<div><span></span>Usually, once I review a film, it&#8217;s done. But sometimes, I am so conflicted over a film that I can&#8217;t help but go back to it. This happened with &#8220;Funny People.&#8221; Critical consensus is telling me not to like this movie, but something inside me is telling me not to listen. </div>
<div><span></span>I finished my review of &#8220;Funny People&#8221; still partially undecided. I am still mixed on my opinion, but if I had to choose one end of the spectrum, &#8220;Funny People&#8221; would fall towards the &#8220;good&#8221; end.</div>
<div><span></span>The reason I have decided to revisit &#8220;Funny People&#8221; is because so much happens in this long movie, and I feel like I barely got to cover everything I wanted to in one review. One thing I really would like to talk more about is the film&#8217;s massive supporting cast. I talked plenty about Seth Rogen and Jonah Hill, but not enough about Jason Schwartzman. Schwartzman is one of my favorite comic actors today, and his performance in &#8220;Funny People&#8221; as an actor who caught a lucky break on a horrible sitcom was a highlight of the film. His performance reminded of his performance in &#8220;Rushmore;&#8221; like Max Fisher, his &#8220;Funny People&#8221; character always casts off an air of superiority for minor achievements. He was born to play smug.</div>
<div><span></span>Also worth mentioning is the always great Leslie Mann and the breakout performance by Aubrey Plaza. On that note, a post on <a href="http://popwatch.ew.com/2009/08/03/funny-people-2/">PopWatch</a> today made a fascinating observation about the portrayal of women in &#8220;Funny People.&#8221; While some wrongly accused Judd Apatow&#8217;s &#8220;Knocked Up&#8221; of being sexist (*cough* Katherine Heigl *cough*), the women in this film are portrayed as being no different then the men. Plaza&#8217;s Daisy is just a struggling comedian like the rest of the guys. Meanwhile, Mann&#8217;s Laura seems much less reactionary than Debbie in &#8220;Knocked Up,&#8221; despite hiding much more sadness.</div>
<div><span></span>There are so many great characters in &#8220;Funny People.&#8221; The real problem with the film was that even with its long running time, you still feel like you want more from the characters. Maybe the problem with the film wasn&#8217;t that it was too long, but that it wasn&#8217;t long enough. I&#8217;m not much of a sequel person but I would not at all mind seeing more of these characters&#8217; lives (luckily, a <em>Randy</em> movie is reportedly in the works).</div>
<div><span></span>Overall, it seems impossible not to recommend this movie because overall, it is a well made movie. It&#8217;s a comedy that&#8217;s not like most comedies coming out nowadays: it&#8217;s not formulaic, it&#8217;s not predictable, and it&#8217;s real. Each of these characters feel like real people with conflicting emotions and even the power to change. But then again, it is an Apatow film.</div>
<div><span></span>&#8220;Funny People&#8221; is definitely different from the rest of Apatow&#8217;s oeuvre. Most of his film&#8217;s endings are decided from the beginning, but it&#8217;s the path to the end that is unpredictable. &#8220;Funny People&#8221; takes the opposite approach. In &#8220;Knocked Up,&#8221; you know from the beginning that one way or another Alison will have the baby, and Ben will one way or another be there. In &#8220;Funny People,&#8221; we know that George will try and win Laura back. Whether or not he&#8217;ll succeed at it, remains unclear. I don&#8217;t know which approach is better but in the end, both work. I am excited to see whether Apatow continues this new approach to comedy. If he does, then &#8220;Funny People&#8221; was just an experiment, something that wasn&#8217;t meant to be perfect. His next film then, should be comic gold.  </div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reeldealblog.com/2009/08/more-thoughts-on-funny-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
