<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>The Reel Deal &#187; Inherent Vice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reeldealblog.com/tag/inherent-vice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reeldealblog.com</link>
	<description>Your source for movies and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2018 20:14:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/6.0" mode="simple" -->
	<itunes:summary>Your source for movies and more!</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>The Reel Deal</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://reeldealblog.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Your source for movies and more!</itunes:subtitle>
	
	<item>
		<title>Oscars 2015: What They Got Right</title>
		<link>http://reeldealblog.com/2015/01/oscars-2015-what-they-got-right/</link>
		<comments>http://reeldealblog.com/2015/01/oscars-2015-what-they-got-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ian0592]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birdman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boyhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everything Is Awesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gone Girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inherent Vice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars 2015]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Lego Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wes Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whiplash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeldealblog.com/?p=2692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The statement &#8220;while I do not agree with some of the nominations, I am happy about most of them&#8221; could literally be said every single year. Time is a freaking flat circle. There have already been a lot of complaints going around, mainly about the lack of Selma (my review and thoughts on that to come). [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2693" style="width: 497px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://reeldealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/WesAndersonRalphFiennesGrandBudapestHotel_article_story_large.jpg"><img class="wp-image-2693" src="http://reeldealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/WesAndersonRalphFiennesGrandBudapestHotel_article_story_large.jpg" alt="WesAndersonRalphFiennesGrandBudapestHotel_article_story_large" width="487" height="325" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image via Hitfix</p></div>
<p>The statement &#8220;while I do not agree with some of the nominations, I am happy about most of them&#8221; could literally be said every single year. Time is a freaking flat circle.</p>
<p>There have already been a lot of complaints going around, mainly about the lack of <em>Selma</em> (my review and thoughts on that to come). With a strong presence of films like <em>The Imitation Game</em> and <em>The Theory of Everything</em> (NOTE: I haven&#8217;t seen either of these yet, so I am guessing here), this was a year made for Oscar movies rather than movies that actually deserved Oscars. However, the ambitious <em>Boyhood </em>and <em>Birdman</em> lead the pack. In order to finally get some Oscar love, Alejandro Inarritu had to finally stop making Oscar movies.</p>
<p>There are many deserving nominees this year. Here are a few I especially loved:</p>
<p><span id="more-2692"></span></p>
<p><strong>Emma Stone</strong></p>
<p>It is hard to steal the spotlight in a film that is commanded by Michael Keaton and Edward Norton, but Emma Stone really proved her worth in <em>Birdman.</em> I never thought she was a bad actress, but I never knew she was this good. <em>Birdman</em> happens to be the kind of film that forces actors to be at the top of their game. Her <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tn48hUyFrKQ">monologue</a> about being relevant still shakes me from time to time.</p>
<p><strong>Everything Is Awesome</strong></p>
<p><em>The Lego Movie</em>&#8216;s egregious snub for Best Animated Feature had everybody shouting, &#8220;everything is not awesome!&#8221; Weird, as this morning started off so well for the <em>Lego Movie</em> team: the first nomination announced was <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StTqXEQ2l-Y">&#8220;Everything Is Awesome&#8221;</a> for Best Original Song. This ode to being a square is one of the most joyous songs written this year. The best part was listening to a room full of crusty old Hollywood types gasp as J.J. Abrams announced this nomination.</p>
<p><strong>Inherent Vice</strong></p>
<p>Adapting Thomas Pynchon is not for the faint at heart, and Paul Thomas Anderson was certainly up for the task. <em>Inherent Vice</em> comes to no clear conclusions and strays so far from the three act structure that it sometimes feels more like a collection of stoned weirdos than an actual movie. By the way, that is a compliment.</p>
<p><strong>Rosamund Pike</strong></p>
<p>Well, at least the Academy made room for one terrifying sociopath.</p>
<p><strong>Wes Anderson</strong></p>
<p><em>The Grand Budapest Hotel</em> is not my favorite Wes Anderson film (alas, I still loved it). However, a Best Director nomination for him has been a long overdue. Sure, it&#8217;s fun to crack jokes about his silly scarves and quirkiness, but let&#8217;s not forget that Anderson is by far one of the most original American directors working today and that <em>The Grand Budapest Hotel</em> had him going to some fantastically dark places. To celebrate, Wes Anderson grabbed a couple of burgers with Royal Tenenbaum and hit the cemetery.</p>
<p><strong>Whiplash</strong></p>
<p><em>Whiplash</em> was my favorite film of the year, so by default I am happy about this. I honestly didn&#8217;t think it would make the Best Picture cut, despite some of the best reviews of the year. After all, this is basically a horror movie, and the Academy hates those. <em>Whiplash</em> is basically an anti-Oscar movie that sticks it to the those traditional tales of triumphing against all odds. Hey guys, the Oscars take risks sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reeldealblog.com/2015/01/oscars-2015-what-they-got-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review: Inherent Vice</title>
		<link>http://reeldealblog.com/2014/12/movie-review-inherent-vice/</link>
		<comments>http://reeldealblog.com/2014/12/movie-review-inherent-vice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 17:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ian0592]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benicio del Toro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inherent Vice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joaquin Phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Brolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katherine Waterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maya Rudolph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Thomas Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reese Witherspoon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeldealblog.com/?p=2575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After watching Inherent Vice, I asked myself two very different questions: 1) Why would I watch this? 2) Why wouldn&#8217;t I watch this? Sometimes, I found myself asking both questions at the exact same time. With Inherent Vice, Paul Thomas Anderson uses his well-earned creative freedom to go down some very strange paths. But with the overlapping stories, Los Angeles [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2581" style="width: 520px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://reeldealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/inherent-vice.jpg"><img class="wp-image-2581" src="http://reeldealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/inherent-vice-1024x576.jpg" alt="inherent vice" width="510" height="287" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">&#8220;The doctor is busy.&#8221; &#8220;He didn&#8217;t look busy.&#8221; &#8220;&#8230;he&#8217;s thinking.&#8221; Image via YouTube</p></div>
<p>After watching <em>Inherent Vice</em>, I asked myself two very different questions:</p>
<p>1) Why would I watch this?</p>
<p>2) Why wouldn&#8217;t I watch this?</p>
<p>Sometimes, I found myself asking both questions at the exact same time.</p>
<p>With Inherent<em> Vice</em>, Paul Thomas Anderson uses his well-earned creative freedom to go down some very strange paths. But with the overlapping stories, Los Angeles setting, and 1970s fashion, Paul Thomas Anderson has never been more at home than he is in <em>Inherent Vice.</em></p>
<p><span id="more-2575"></span></p>
<p>PTA loves collaborating with the same actors again and again, but I think he has finally found his muse in Joaquin Phoenix, who has shown that with this and <em>The Master</em>, he is really good at playing very eccentric dudes. In <em>Inherent Vice</em>, Phoenix plays Doc Sportello, who I guess is a doctor because he seems to go to a doctor&#8217;s office everyday for work. During his off hours, he moonlights as a private detective. If you want a good idea of who Doc is, just picture if The Dude was around in the right time and place. Doc is a loud and proud hippie during a time when it was okay to chain smoke joints in front of a police officer. While lounging in his beachside bungalow, Doc&#8217;s ex-lady Shasta (Katherine Waterson) pays him a visit. She needs him to help foil a half-baked extortion plot involving her rich new boyfriend. After much explanation and little hesitation, Doc offers his services.</p>
<p>Now, why would Doc stick his neck out for somebody who broke his heart? That is one of the many mysteries that lies within <em>Inherent Vice</em>. This is a film noir in which one of the biggest mysteries concerns what we might possibly do for love. This film is all over the map. Normally, that would be a bad thing. But here, that is precisely what makes it all work.</p>
<p>While <em>Inherent Vice</em> is not Paul Thomas Andeson&#8217;s masterpiece, it feels like years of watching his films could better train you and prepare you for this one. This is an ensemble piece where big names drift in and out. Some come back, and others disappear without a trace. For some reason, the narrator (Joanna Newsom), has no real stake in the events at all. She serves sometimes as an audience surrogate, and other times as a spiritual advisor, as if she appears ignorant but knows some deep truth that she refuses to reveal. Many great stories rely on unreliable narrators. This story needs one, because there is not a single reliable character to be found here.</p>
<p>I have not read <em>Inherent Vice</em>, nor anything else by Thomas Pynchon (although I did once tell my professor that I read <em>The Crying of Lot 49</em>), but I can say with utmost confidence that Paul Thomas Anderson is the perfect choice to direct this. Anderson, who is an LA native, treats his home city not as this bright, glamorous place, but rather as a hodgepodge of outlaws and misfits who all want their chance in the spotlight. Think of what would happen if <em>L.A. Confidential</em>, <em>Chinatown</em>, and <em>Muholland Dr.</em> were all thrown into a blender together. This is a version of Los Angeles where everybody eats pizza and nobody drives on any freeways. Here I thought everybody in LA was sipping on kale smoothies while driving down the 101 all the time.</p>
<p><em>Inherent Vice</em> looks and feels like the kind of film that isn&#8217;t made that much anymore. Thanks to the beautiful, grainy film stock, <em>Inherent Vice</em> doesn&#8217;t even look like it was made in 2014. It is a film nerd&#8217;s paradise, and a period piece that actually looks like a relic of that period. Too many filmmakers try to shoot period pieces in digital and when that happens, they end up with <em>Public Enemies.</em></p>
<p>This also happens to be the funniest movie that PTA has ever made, and this is the same guy who made one movie with Adam Sandler and another where Joaquin Phoenix farts in front of Philip Seymour Hoffman. In one scene, Doc screams after looking at a picture. The trailer does not do it justice. The way that Doc tries to act like nothing happened is comic genius. Each character, from Doc to Brolin&#8217;s scummy LAPD officer (Josh Brolin) are so cartoonish to the point of farce. But then, something will pop up like a scene in which Doc and Shasta run down Sunset Boulevard on a rainy day. It is a beautiful scene, and a reminder that all these characters are just lonely people in a big city who are looking for love.</p>
<p>Honestly, I do not think this review, or one viewing alone, can do this film justice. Characters ask a lot of questions, and then other characters question those questions. Sometimes, it is exhausting. Other times, it is exhilarating. This is the kind of film noir that constantly questions why it is even trying to solve a mystery in the first place. But let&#8217;s quickly go back to those questions I posed earlier:</p>
<p>1) <em>Why would you watch this movie?</em> It&#8217;s a long, muddled mess. There&#8217;s a lot more talking than action and it is really hard to keep track of what is going on. Plus, Katherine Waterson is only naked once.</p>
<p>2) <em>Why wouldn&#8217;t you watch this movie? </em>Once is good enough. Also, this film embraces confusion and chaos like few others do dare to. It just goes for it. If <em>True Detective</em> and <em>Serial</em> have taught us anything this year, it is that the clues and the intrigue are often even more fascinating than the end result.</p>
<p>If you want, you can get lost in the forest and have a panic attack. Or, you can wander around and admire the trees. Or better yet, you can chop down all the trees and complain about them on Reddit.</p>
<p><strong>Brain Farts From The Edge:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>I really hope Josh Brolin scores an Oscar nomination for this. I want a Josh Brolin pull string doll that shouts, &#8220;molto panacako!&#8221; over and over again.</li>
<li>I spent about six months in Southern California, and never once did I have a frozen banana. Between <em>Inherent Vice</em> and <em>Arrested Development</em>, I guess this is a part of LA culture that I somehow missed. Oh well. FOMO</li>
<li>Cameo of the year: Martin Short running with his pants down.</li>
<li>Is it really that easy to just become a detective? I should have started doing this years ago.</li>
<li>With <em>Inherent Vice</em> and <a href="http://reeldealblog.com/2014/11/movie-review-nightcrawler/"><em>Nightcrawler</em></a>, 2014 has been a great year for making LA look really cool.</li>
<li>Rarely is this question asked: why doesn&#8217;t Jena Malone get more work?</li>
<li>There is an amazing moment that happens towards the end of any given Paul Thomas Anderson film. The end credits are about to roll, and you know that it is going to end abruptly. Boom. Cut to black. Immediately, the audience erupts in chatter. Not because they are rude and anxious, but because they are confused and stunned all at once. This is what makes the shared cinematic experience so special.</li>
<li>Time to see this thing again. And write a better review.</li>
</ul>
<p><img class="aligncenter" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BxMGgoRCEAAovLA.png" alt="" width="511" height="274" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reeldealblog.com/2014/12/movie-review-inherent-vice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trailer Park: Inherent Vice</title>
		<link>http://reeldealblog.com/2014/09/trailer-park-inherent-vice/</link>
		<comments>http://reeldealblog.com/2014/09/trailer-park-inherent-vice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 01:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ian0592]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inherent Vice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joaquin Phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Thomas Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trailers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeldealblog.com/?p=2195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The trailer for Inherent Vice, the latest Paul Thomas Anderson joint, was just released. Let&#8217;s see if it meets all of the criteria on the PTA checklist: Southern California? Check Ambient score? Check Insanely detailed period piece details? Check Promise of random, brutal violence? Check Okay, now we&#8217;re talking. But I&#8217;m going to try and not [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://reeldealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Screen-shot-2014-09-29-at-9.14.52-PM.png"><img class="wp-image-2196 aligncenter" src="http://reeldealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Screen-shot-2014-09-29-at-9.14.52-PM.png" alt="Screen shot 2014-09-29 at 9.14.52 PM" width="530" height="295" /></a></p>
<p>The trailer for <em>Inherent Vice</em>, the latest Paul Thomas Anderson joint, was just released. Let&#8217;s see if it meets all of the criteria on the PTA checklist:</p>
<ul>
<li>Southern California? Check</li>
<li>Ambient score? Check</li>
<li>Insanely detailed period piece details? Check</li>
<li>Promise of random, brutal violence? Check</li>
</ul>
<p>Okay, now we&#8217;re talking.</p>
<p><span id="more-2195"></span></p>
<p>But I&#8217;m going to try and not get too ahead of myself. After all, I remember <em>The Master</em>. More specifically, I remember the trailer, which promised a taut thriller based on Scientology. What PTA ended up giving us wasn&#8217;t bad, but I still feel like I missed something.</p>
<p>My point is that trailers can be misleading so sometimes, it&#8217;s nice to view them as works of art separate from the film itself. And holy crap, does the <em>Inherent Vice</em> trailer deliver. It boasts three odd music choices in under three minutes, acting that is already cracking me up, and the promise of a mystery I want to be a part of. I have no idea what <em>Inherent Vice</em> is about, but I have already seen enough to know that I am interested. Seriously, I think it&#8217;s time that the Oscars create a category for trailers. Let&#8217;s just hope that PTA Anderson still has some movie magic up his sleeve.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><iframe width="625" height="352" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wZfs22E7JmI?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Joaquin Phoenix is an underrated national treasure. Is it just me, or did anyone see shades of John Belushi in Phoenix here? Is it too late to cast him in the Belushi biopic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reeldealblog.com/2014/09/trailer-park-inherent-vice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
