Yearly Archives: 2009

Movie Review: Happiness

Think of the weirdest thing you’ve ever seen in your life. You might think it was weird, but after seeing “Happiness,” you won’t know what weird is anymore. I don’t say this in a negative way. “Happiness” exceeds any level of strangeness and thus propels itself into its very own, unique category.

“Happiness” has no plot, only many characters. The decisions, good and bad, of these characters is what ultimately propels the story forward. It is an ensemble film which contains a sprawling cast. The story focuses on many different New Jersey residents, each who are far from happy. The ensemble includes Allen (Phillip Seymour Hoffman), a lonely man who’s afraid to talk to women, a lonely woman (Jane Adams) who’s afraid of the future, a married therapist (Dylan Baker) with a disturbing secret, a shallow writer (Lara Flynn Boyle), and an old couple who can no longer feel love.
Each character is presented in their own original story at first. Over time, the stories start to overlap, and it is revealed that every character is somehow related. One character is the sibling of another who is friends of another character and neighbors with another. At certain times, you’ll scream in shock to see one character’s unexpected relation with another. But at the same time, it allows you to see another side of each character. A contrast between one or the other, a look at how much deeper their emotions go than we thought we knew. 
Yes, the movie is strange and uncomfortable. Conversations are evoked that one would never have in ordinary life, topics I can’t even mention here. However, the awkward moments don’t detract from the story but instead make it better. They turn into little idiosyncrasies that reveal something about each character, whether it is a vulnerability, or an unknown strong point. Overall, the awkwardness is another method that brings together every character into a giant web.
While watching “Happiness,” I was reminded of “Magnolia.” “Magnolia is another story that is more about the characters than the actual plot, it is a story in which small decisions propel the plot forward with no real goal or destination at the end. However, “Happiness” does contain some sort of goal: a goal for the characters to reach the titular feeling. How they will do that is what they must figure out.
“Happiness” is directed with close precision by Todd Solondz. He uses the camera to usually follow around the characters, create creepy shadows to show one character’s slip into madness, and many times allow different characters to chime in for narration. There is not one narrator, because not one character is truly the center of attention in this story. Despite the technical triumphs, the real triumph of the film is Hoffman’s performance. Only he could make a character so unlikeable yet so easy to sympathize for at the same time.
“Happiness” can be seen in many different lights. Some may view it as a pitch black comedy that gets huge laughs out of squirms. Others will see it as a very dark, brooding drama that is set up to reveal the flaws of each and therefore the fundamental flaws of mankind. The film, like “American Beauty,” (which came out just a year after “Happiness), portrays ordinary people doing whatever they can to break free and discover truly the things that will bring them to a state of nirvana. You can enjoy this deep subtext within “Happiness,” or you can just enjoy it for what it is: a smart, daring, devilishly funny look at those small things in life that no one likes talking about it. 

Kaitlin Olson Gets A Movie Role

Kaitlin Olson, one of the stars of the TV series “It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia” is one of the funniest women is showbiz right now up there with the ranks of Tina Fey and Amy Poehler. Her brilliant improv and fearlessness to do anything (like nearly vomit while performing stand up) make her a joy to watch. Now, she has been cast in a lead role in the upcoming film “Leap Year,” starring alongside Amy Adams.

Hopefully, this will finally get her some mainstream recognition. And if any Emmy voters are currently reading this, please just give her the award recognition she deserves.
Below is a fine sample of her work:

Summer Movie Trailers: I Love You, Beth Cooper & Public Enemies

I Love You, Beth Cooper
The trailer for “I Love You, Beth Cooper” might seem a little off-putting without some context. First off, it is based off of a book written by Larry Doyle (a writer from “The Simpsons”). It’s a last night of high school story that was written in a wide-range of obscure and obvious pop culture references, strange math equations, slapstick, but a tender heart at the center. The trailer only seems to focus on the slapstick part of the story. I pray this is merely a typical marketing strategy to attract a younger crowd and not a big studio butchering of intelligent comedy. Nevertheless, Doyle wrote the screenplay for the movie. Hopefully, he’ll stay faithful to his own work because if he does, audiences will be looking at something of a much less innocent, much more awkward modern day version of “American Graffiti.” Trailer below:

Public Enemies
All I can say is that pretty much everything about the trailer looks flawless. “Public Enemies” looks like what might happen if “Goodfellas,” “Bonnie & Clyde,” “The Untouchables,” and “American Gangster” were thrown into a blender. In other words, a film about the somewhat human side of a gangster and a larger-than-life portrayal of a larger-than-life criminal. Most importantly, don’t skip the film because you can’t take Christian Bale seriously after his now infamous, over-the-top rant. If “American Psycho” proves anything, it’s that this man knows how to give a fine performance. Plus, Depp has already impressed once by playing a criminal (George Jung in “Blow”), so I think he can do it again.  Trailer Below:

Movie Review: Away We Go (Early Screening)

At a glance of the poster for Away We Go, you might think it’s a “been there, done that” movie. The poster looks like a rip off of the opening credits of Juno and the poster of Once; all like a typical quirky indie flick. But, look closer (coincidentally, the tagline of director Sam Mendes’s previous film American Beauty) and you’ll find a small gem of a film that’s slow but ultimately refreshing in the current movie market place.

Away We Go begins with a thirty-something couple, in love for many years yet unmarried, finding out that they are about to have their first child. The man is Burt (John Krasinski). Burt never finished college and is currently struggling to make it as an insurance salesman. The expecting mother is Verona (Maya Rudolph), a struggling artist. 
Burt and Verona can barely make ends meet and hope to bring their child up in a better environment. Like a couple of pilgrims searching for a better life, they head out to explore America, visiting friends and family in different cities to ultimately find the right place to live. They travel all over, from the dry Arizona desert, to frigid Canada.
In every city, they meet a series of eccentric characters. There’s Verona’s very profane former co-worker (Allison Janney) in Phoenix and Burt’s hippy cousin (Maggie Gyllenhaal) in Madison, among many others. What the audience learns is that each person they meet has a very different perception of family and a very different view of how to raise children. So as they travel they are not just visiting friends, they’re learning how to raise a family. 
Away We Go’s director, Sam Mendes, is perhaps most famous for his Best Picture winning debut film, American Beauty. American Beauty dealt largely with characters fighting their outer perceptions and eventually learning about the inner feelings of others. Away We Go deals with this theme through a wide range of American culture. Burt and Verona stay with what seems like a peaceful hippy; but she turns out to be an overbearing mother. Meanwhile, their college friend and his wife seem as happy as any couple can be, but they have a dark, underlying secret.
It is not just Burt and Verona however, who are learning new things about other people. The audience becomes sort of a third invisible character and becomes a part of seeing how the characters change as well perceptions of them. Even though Burt seems immature at times and a little lazy we soon realize that he has passion and an extreme dedication to being a parent. Verona’s refusal to marry Burt might seem like a lack of commitment at first but then it turns out to be a testament of love.
One of the finest features of Away We Go is its often breathtaking cinematography. Cinematographer Ellen Kuras focuses on the world around the characters, not just the tiny little bubble they live in. The movie takes its time to show the sun rising over the desert or a shot of the usually bright Miami in a very quiet, dark night.
The movie is bolstered by fine performances. Krasinski retains his hilarious Jim Halpert (from The Office) awkwardness and Rudolph’s very moving performance shows much depth for an actress known mostly for impersonating Paris Hilton and Oprah on Saturday Night Live. Meanwhile, the two brief appearances by Janney, Gyllenhaal, and Jim Gaffigan manage to be brilliant scene stealers.
Away We Go is by no means perfect. It takes time to get into the characters and the road trip story feels somewhat too familiar at times. However, it manages to be so original in that it does something few movies do today: rather than having tragic experiences tear the characters apart, it manages to just keep bringing them closer and closer together and the relationship feel all the more real. Wouldn’t it be nice if every movie treated its characters this way?

Movie Review: Rachel Getting Married

Is it impossible to forgive someone who has hurt you so badly? What if they are family, should you forgive them then? That is an essential questions that looms in the background and drives the plot of the heartbreaking but ultimately spiritually uplifting Rachel Getting Married.

If you thought your family was dysfunctional, then you truly have no idea. The family of Rachel Getting Married makes the Tenenbaums look like the Bradys.
Rachel Getting Married isn’t so much about Rachel. The story focuses on Kym (Anne Hathaway). Kym has been in and out of rehab for ten years and returns back to her Connecticut home to attend her sister Rachel’s (Rosemarrie DeWitt) wedding. Once Kym returns, old family tensions and tragedies are resurrected and the perfect wedding weekend turns into a near ship wreck.
What could’ve been a typical indie flick about quirky and dysfunctional characters is carefully guided away from cliche with a complex screenplay by Jenny Lumet (daughter of Sydney Lumet) and finely crafted direction from Jonathan Demme (The Silence of the Lambs). Even though this movie is a world apart from Silence of the Lambs, Demme doesn’t treat it much differently. Kym isn’t much different from Clarice Starling; both characters are haunted by a tragedy in the past that seems to in one way or another have engulfed their life and their well-being. 
Rachel Getting Married‘s cinematography is like a mini tour de force. It often looks shakey like a home video, other times the screen is covered in a light shade of yellow, other times it gets blurrier as the family’s relationships get more and more strained.
As mentioned above, the movie is not about Rachel, but about Kym. It’s Hathaway’s commanding performance that turns Kym into the film’s most powerful character, as she steals every scene she’s in. It’s a huge contrast for the actress who once starred in Princess Diaries. Kym is no princess; she’s emaciated, bruised, and scarred internally in a way that to most would be an unimaginably harsh pain to ever get rid of. 
Even though Kym is so flawed, Hathaway makes her so likable. She does this by focusing on her strong points and turning her into a human being who is hiding incredible will power and even has a strong sense of humor. If Hathaway continues to play characters like this, she will likely go down as one of the finest actresses of her time. In the future, critics and historians will be scratching their heads over why the Academy snubbed this performance.
Rachel Getting Married is like a double-edged sword: it is both unbelievably heartbreaking yet so uplifting at the same time. That is because it deals with the idea of redemption and the possibility that a person can face one’s demons and overlook anyone’s flaws no matter what and ultimately learn how to forgive. Rachel Getting Married gets this message across without hammering it in the audience’s face; it gets it across by showing simple, relatable human interactions. This is the kind of thing that propels a movie from good to greatness. This is one of the best movies of 2008.

"Parks & Recreation": A Good Start?

On Thursday April 9, the much anticipated “Parks & Recreation” began. It comes with much hype and in a time when good comedy is in dire need. So, how is the show thus far? Not amazing, but based on precedent, I will give it benefit of the doubt.

“Parks” was made by the creators of the American adaptation of “The Office.” The show centers around Leslie Knope (Amy Poehler). Knope works for the government in the Parks & Rec department in the fictional town of Pawnee, Indiana. Knope is ambitious and too overly giddy for a public servant. While her co-workers don’t care much about their jobs or the government, she takes her job seriously. Looking up to her idols Sarah Palin and Nancy Pelosi, Knope dreams of being the first female president.
The office members of “Parks” are fewer than those of “The Office,” but each have their own quirks. There’s Knope’s wise-cracking assistant Tom (Aziz Ansari) and the pessimistic, government-hating Ron (Nick Offerman). Joining the crew is Pawnee local Ann Perkins (Rashida Jones), who comes to complain about a vacant lot where her boyfriend broke her leg. Knope then comes up with the idea of turning the lot into a new park, a story line that will most likely carry out the rest of the first season. 
“Parks” co-creators Greg Daniels and Michael Schur have a perfect eye for casting. Poehler is perhaps most flawlessly cast. She plays the same sort of kind-hearted, over ambitious, and loopy characters she made a career out of while on “Saturday Night Live.” Knope herself is probably something of a young Hilary Clinton. 
“Parks” will likely draw comparisons to “The Office,” which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Like “The Office,” the show is shot in a documentary style with tracking shots and shots from far away or through bushes. It gives the feeling that we’re watching from afar the lives of these ordinary people that we never thought could be so interesting.
The problem with “Parks” is that there’s nothing really bad about it, but nothing too amazing either. However, “The Office” had the same, tepid start but grew over time. “Parks” may need that same time to grow, and expand its characters; so don’t give up hope on it yet because based solely on two episodes I can say that I am excited to see Leslie Knope and the rest of her Karl Roveesque schemes.

Temporary Vacancy

From Friday, April 10 to Saturday, April 18 no new posts will be up. During this time, I will be in the Dominican Republic, building an aqueduct for a poor, waterless community. Hopefully, I will return with much video footage and maybe reviews of “Adventureland” (which I hope to see soon) and Parks & Recreation” (thanks NBC for deciding to premiere it on Passover. Not like many Jews like comedy anyway…). I don’t want to leave you on a bitter note so I will inform you that “Eastbound & Down” is officially coming back for a second season. Good. The more Kenny Powers, the better.

In the meantime, I hope this will alleviate your boredom:

Movie Review: I Love You, Man

Finally, a romantic comedy that guys and girls alike can enjoy. “I Love You Man” is a movie that takes a tired plot and tries to do something new with it. For the most part, it succeeds.

  “I Love You Man” begins with Peter Klaven (Paul Rudd), a timid real estate agent, proposing to his long time girlfriend Zooey (Rashida Jones) in an empty lot amid downtown Los Angeles. She says yes. From there, the movie is about pre-wedding anxiety. Peter realizes his whole life that he has connected with women so well, but has never had any guy friends. So, he goes on a quest to find a best man before his wedding.

   After a series of failed “man-dates,” Peter stumbles upon Sydney Fife (Jason Segel). Sydney is the kind of guy everyone wishes was their friend: he’s funny, philosophical, and does his own thing. Plus, he has a dog named after an Egyptian president. In no time, the two become nothing short of best friends.

   “I Love You Man” is equipped with an ensemble that includes some of the best names in comedy. There are a few old legends (Jane Curtin, J.K. Simmons), a few new legends (Jon Favreau, Andy Samberg), and a few rising stars (Thomas Lennon, Sarah Burns). However, the real stars of the movie remain Rudd and Segel.

  For years, Rudd was known as a great sidekick in movies like “Anchorman” and “The 40-Year-Old Virgin.” Last November, his performance in “Role Models” proved that the hilarious pessimistic cynicism he brings to supporting roles could work well in lead performances as well. In “I Love You Man,” he is given the chance to once again lead, and he shines. This time, he manages to bring more awkwardness than cynicism into the character of Peter. Rather than being someone who can’t communicate with women as in most romantic comedies, he is someone who can’t communicate with men. Rudd uses this for full, cringe worthy effect.

    Also further improving his comedic ability is Segel.  His performance here is less sad sack than his performance in last year’s “Forgetting Sarah Marshall” and more like his performance in “Freaks and Geeks,” as he is someone who seems to enjoy his ridiculously unrealistic life while being totally oblivious to reality.

   Although “I Love You Man”’s plot is at times by-the-numbers, it doesn’t feel that way because of the twist added to it. The writers also deserve credit for incorporating the Lou Ferrigno cameo into the plot rather than just having it there for the sake of having a celebrity cameo. Also, it is great that writers John Hamburg and Larry Levin turned the final wedding scene into a somewhat serious moment rather than a cheap parody of “The Graduate.”

   Unfortunately, this movie isn’t flawless. Favreu steals almost every scene he is in, but his marriage plotline could’ve been tied together better with the main storyline to provide insight into the struggling relationship between Pete and Zooey. Also, Samberg and Simmons are criminally underused. 

  While “I Love You Man” contains the usual cast and crew of a Judd Apatow production, his name is totally absent from the credits. However, he still manages to leave his mark on the final production. Like an Apatow film, “I Love You Man” shows great respect for its characters and doesn’t laugh in their faces when they fail. “I Love You Man” shows you don’t have to be mean to be funny.