Category Archives: Uncategorized

The Top 10: Directors

Well, the Top 10 has disappeared for a while, but now it’s back. This time, we’ll focus on directors. These brave men are the true architects of the cinema; they must be daring. They bring ideas to life any way they can. This list, are the directors who do it best:

1. Stanley Kubrick- Kubrick once said, “if it can be written or thought, it can be filmed.” To this man, the term “unfilmable” didn’t exist. Kubrick had an imagination like few others, an imagination that spilled over onto the screen. He had the ability to show the dark side of something good (technology) or the beautiful, even hilarious side of something tragic (war). He could also make long stretches of silence exciting and ridiculous dystopian futures seem frighteningly real. He made the impossible possible, and like great men before him like Einstein, Galileo, and Darwin–he extended the limits of the human imagination.

2. Quentin Tarantino- This man inspired my obsession with film because he is a man as obsessed with film as I am. Tarantino’s films are not violent, vulgar trash but rather loving odes to the violent, vulgar trash he watched in his youth. His tributes bring to the light the obscure films of his era into our own. Without him, the words Leone, Kurosawa, Scorsese, Ford, and Eastwood would sound like nothing more than foreign objects.
3. Martin Scorsese- The 1970s was perhaps the greatest period of American filmmaking. And Scorsese was the greatest of the period. Like a film out of the French New Wave, it contains loose narrative structure and a large degree of social realism and awareness. Few directors know the art of directing better than him, nor understand the tremendous effect that simply dimming the lights or playing downbeat music can have on an entire film.
4. Sergio Leone- When people think Western they think America. They think of Wayne and Ford. But really what they should think of is Italy and Leone. Like Kubrick, Leone works best under great silences; creating intensity through creepy stares. Like any great western director, he observed the landscape and fully exploited its stunning beauty, from the buttes of Monument Valley to the crowded streets of Brooklyn in his underrated foray into the gangster drama, “Once Upon a Time in America.” No doubt though, he is most famous for the conclusion of “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly,” when the showdown between three outlaws culminates into one of the most thrilling uses of music and suspense ever put into the movies. Thank Leone for that.
5. Joel & Ethan Coen- Many directors work great alone. Not this sibling team, who are sometimes labeled “the two-headed director.” They brilliantly exploit their characters’ flaws, and turn the landscapes they film into their own personal canvas. Upon first viewing, some of their characters might seem one-dimensional, but after multiple viewings, deeper dimensions come out. Perhaps just one piece of evidence proves the Coen Brothers greatness: they created The Dude.
6. Judd Apatow- With only two features (it might seem like more with all of his producing projects), Apatow has already established himself as a leading voice of the comedy world. He directs in a different way than one would expect a great director to. He stays out the way, with simple still shots rather than complex aerial or tracking shots. Meanwhile, he famously chooses his actors before even writing the script, and once shooting starts, he practically lets them do whatever they want, and therefore his films feel more natural. Apatow proves that the director that directs best is one that directs least.
7. John Ford- The father of the Western genre. Despite the racism and political incorrectness of his movies, they still stand the test of time. His “The Searchers” has inspired sci-fi films (“Star Wars), war movies (“Apocalypse Now”), and crime dramas (“Taxi Driver”) amongst others. Just from that one movie alone, Ford proved that the universal language of film is the concept that a simple, human story can fit into any setting, any genre, at any time.
8. Wes Anderson- Many directors fall into the dreadful category of style over substance. Anderson however, defies all odds and is able to achieve both style and substance by bringing out substance through his style.
9. Steven Speilberg- Because, how could I not? He’s one of the few directors that is more famous than his stars. He is also the father of the summer blockbuster. Today, this might seem like a negative thing, but following Speilberg’s model could bring about that seemingly unachievable balance between art and entertainment, a sort of nirvana every great director hopes to achieve. Just remember, behind the dazzling effects of “E.T.” is the story of a young boy’s connection with an alien, and behind the horror of “Jaws” is the story of a man who will do anything to protect his family and community. Speilberg also showed he was capable of more serious work, with “Schindler’s List,” “Saving Private Ryan,” and “Munich” quickly ranking among the finest movies ever made.
10. Clint Eastwood- Everyone knew the man could act, but who knew he could direct? Taking tips from his mentors Sergio Leone and Don Siegel, Eastwood went on to make a name for himself directing epic westerns, epic war movies, and smaller, human dramas.
Other Contenders: Roman Polanksi, Francis Ford Coppola, Mel Brooks, Woody Allen, Paul Thomas Anderson, Akira Kurosawa, Francis Truffaut, Hayao Miyazaki, Ingmar Bergman, Alfred Hitchcock, David Lynch, Milos Foreman

Movie Review: The 400 Blows

When “The 400 Blows” opened in 1959, it delivered more than 400 blows to everything people loved and cherished so much in cinema. It changed the way a story could be told on screen. No more formal structure. No more conclusive endings. Just…life.

“The 400 Blows,” a pivotal film from the French New Wave, is short in length yet deep in content. It follows Antoine (Jean-Pierre Leaud), a delinquent of a child whose stealing money and telling lies when he’s not being abused by his overbearing parents or his overly controlling and abusive teacher. Antoine is something of a young Cool Hand Luke wearing a Terry Malloy jacket: he commits crimes yet struggles with remorse; he makes petty crimes seem somewhat stylish.
Like Luke, Antoine tries many failed attempts at escaping his wretched life. The great paradox of the film lies within the fact that the more and more Antoine is put in chains, the more and more free he ultimately comes. This paradox is no more apparent than in the iconic final shot, as Antoine gazes at both freedom and confusion.
“The 400 Blows” is perhaps the pinnacle of the French New Wave; a post WWII film movement which embraced the iconoclasm and rebellion from society’s typical ideals. Not only was the New Wave breaking free from the burden’s of society, but also the burden’s of typical, mainstream filmmaking. Nowhere is this more apparent than in “The 400 Blows.” Francois Truffaut takes him time telling the story, and it is time well spent.
Truffaut doesn’t rush through events, no matter how insignificant. Maybe watching Antoine drink an entire bottle of stolen milk doesn’t move the plot along, but it reveals certain, small things about the life of the character. Most important is the nearly three minutes Truffaut spends capturing Antoine wandering through miles of countryside. Three minutes may be short in reality, but it could feel like an eternity in the film world. Three minutes is an especially long time to capture someone walking. However, I felt like this dialogue free scene could’ve gone on for hours and I wouldn’t have minded because of the way every tiny detail is captured. There is the background score, the way in which Antoine carefully yet cavalierly wanders, or the breathtaking scenery.
This attention to small detail could be considered a turning point in filmmaking. While many movies simply move along as quickly as they can to reach the conclusion, “The 400 Blows” takes it time and doesn’t quite care when it arrives because frankly, Antoine doesn’t quite care when he arrives, just as long as he is going somewhere.
Perhaps I am over-exaggerating the film’s breakthroughs. Perhaps many films before it tried the same new style, yet no matter what, “The 400 Blows” achieves to perfection. It is one of the few movies you will ever see that contains so little action yet is so exciting, one that is pushed along not by events, but by people.

Watch: Precious (aka Push) Trailer

“Precious” (still is and always will be titled “Push” in my mind), a movie I reported with a sensational review a few months ago at Sundance, is finally making its way to theaters. The release date is not set yet but hopefully it’ll be sometime soon. 

“Precious” follows Precious (Gabby Sidibe), an overweight black girl whose pregnant with the second child of her father. She lives with an abusive mother (Mo’Nique) on welfare. 
Too often I say a movie is extremely depressing yet uplifting in the end, but this time, I truly mean it. Few films will put you into the depths of the most horrible abuse and tragedy and then shine a tiny glimmer of hope above your head. Seeing this movie might not just make you a better person.
Watch the trailer below; if you tear up over it then be prepared for the movie (not that this should discourage you from seeing it). Also, keep Mo’Nique down as a frontrunner in your Oscar pool. Seriously, snubbing her stunning performance would be a crime:

Lost: Season Five In Review

(Warning: Article may contain spoilers. Do not read if you have not yet watched the season five finale)

Wow. That is the only word that comes to me when thinking about season five of “Lost” and its finale. 
Season five certainly wasn’t the best season (that still remains season three) or the most emotional (that would be season one). However, it was certainly the strangest. And I mean that in the same way as I did for “Happiness.” I mean the kind of strange that is strange because it is something unseen, something many would think of but few would ever carry out. They went back and forth between over two periods of time. Flashbacks became flash-forwards. Past became present. Future became present. And then, the bomb went off. Yes, the bomb went off. While most shows give off the sense of security that the bomb will never go off, the characters will always be safe, “Lost” threw that notion out the door. It threw the characters right in front of a speeding train.
And then, it took this twist one step further and made it the final moment of the season. So now we are forced to wonder: were they really put in harm’s way? Will the bomb save them, or kill them all? My friends, it looks like we’ll have to wait until 2010 to find that out.
This season, the cast shined as usual. Terry O’Quinn (Locke) and Michael Emerson (Ben) were standouts as usual. However, this season’s biggest standout was Jeremy Davies. Davies portrayed Daniel Faraday, a scientist who seemed timid and clueless in season four but really had every answer the survivors were looking for. Another standout was Josh Holloway, who’s Sawyer underwent one of the biggest character transformations in “Lost” history this season. 
This season wasn’t perfect. The constant time jumping in the first few episodes was too hectic and too difficult to keep up with. Once Locke turned the wheel and the island stopped moving, things seemed to go back to normal. However, things were far from normal. While the past four seasons contained either past and present or present and future, this season managed to use all three and balance them out perfectly. 
Each season of “Lost” has mixed science with science fiction by setting of themes of faith vs. science and mythology. This season it took a way more scientific approach and examined time travel. Not just time travel, but the implications of it. A new twist of “Lost”‘s central argument of fate vs. freewill: can humans change the past? Or was everything bound to happen no matter what? “Lost” never answered this question because this question should be up to the viewer. It is one of those things that no person could ever answer correctly.
The season five finale set up multiple new problems to be solved next season and questions demanding answers. Ben has killed Jacob, but what will happen when Jacob dies? When will Jin & Sun reunite? But most importantly, will the island even exist anymore now that Juliet (Elizabeth Mitchell) detonated the bomb? I can’t answer any of these questions but I will say this: Damon Lindelof & Carlton Cuse have continued to hold my attention, and I cannot wait until next year to find out all of the answers in the season to conclude one of the greatest sci-fi masterpieces ever made.

Taking Back An Old Post

About a year ago, I expressed much anger and shame in a possible decision by the Academy to let Justin Timberlake host the Oscars. I apologize for this claim. To be fair, the Academy called him a “song-and-dance” man and all I could see him as was a member of ‘N Sync. Times have changed and I would not mind seeing Timberlake as an Oscar host.* Want to know why? Watch and learn: 

*A Timberlake-Samberg team up would be great. However, I still have my hopes set on a Stewart-Colbert team up or the small possibility of bringing Mitch Hedberg back to life for one night.



Movie Review: Happiness

Think of the weirdest thing you’ve ever seen in your life. You might think it was weird, but after seeing “Happiness,” you won’t know what weird is anymore. I don’t say this in a negative way. “Happiness” exceeds any level of strangeness and thus propels itself into its very own, unique category.

“Happiness” has no plot, only many characters. The decisions, good and bad, of these characters is what ultimately propels the story forward. It is an ensemble film which contains a sprawling cast. The story focuses on many different New Jersey residents, each who are far from happy. The ensemble includes Allen (Phillip Seymour Hoffman), a lonely man who’s afraid to talk to women, a lonely woman (Jane Adams) who’s afraid of the future, a married therapist (Dylan Baker) with a disturbing secret, a shallow writer (Lara Flynn Boyle), and an old couple who can no longer feel love.
Each character is presented in their own original story at first. Over time, the stories start to overlap, and it is revealed that every character is somehow related. One character is the sibling of another who is friends of another character and neighbors with another. At certain times, you’ll scream in shock to see one character’s unexpected relation with another. But at the same time, it allows you to see another side of each character. A contrast between one or the other, a look at how much deeper their emotions go than we thought we knew. 
Yes, the movie is strange and uncomfortable. Conversations are evoked that one would never have in ordinary life, topics I can’t even mention here. However, the awkward moments don’t detract from the story but instead make it better. They turn into little idiosyncrasies that reveal something about each character, whether it is a vulnerability, or an unknown strong point. Overall, the awkwardness is another method that brings together every character into a giant web.
While watching “Happiness,” I was reminded of “Magnolia.” “Magnolia is another story that is more about the characters than the actual plot, it is a story in which small decisions propel the plot forward with no real goal or destination at the end. However, “Happiness” does contain some sort of goal: a goal for the characters to reach the titular feeling. How they will do that is what they must figure out.
“Happiness” is directed with close precision by Todd Solondz. He uses the camera to usually follow around the characters, create creepy shadows to show one character’s slip into madness, and many times allow different characters to chime in for narration. There is not one narrator, because not one character is truly the center of attention in this story. Despite the technical triumphs, the real triumph of the film is Hoffman’s performance. Only he could make a character so unlikeable yet so easy to sympathize for at the same time.
“Happiness” can be seen in many different lights. Some may view it as a pitch black comedy that gets huge laughs out of squirms. Others will see it as a very dark, brooding drama that is set up to reveal the flaws of each and therefore the fundamental flaws of mankind. The film, like “American Beauty,” (which came out just a year after “Happiness), portrays ordinary people doing whatever they can to break free and discover truly the things that will bring them to a state of nirvana. You can enjoy this deep subtext within “Happiness,” or you can just enjoy it for what it is: a smart, daring, devilishly funny look at those small things in life that no one likes talking about it. 

Kaitlin Olson Gets A Movie Role

Kaitlin Olson, one of the stars of the TV series “It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia” is one of the funniest women is showbiz right now up there with the ranks of Tina Fey and Amy Poehler. Her brilliant improv and fearlessness to do anything (like nearly vomit while performing stand up) make her a joy to watch. Now, she has been cast in a lead role in the upcoming film “Leap Year,” starring alongside Amy Adams.

Hopefully, this will finally get her some mainstream recognition. And if any Emmy voters are currently reading this, please just give her the award recognition she deserves.
Below is a fine sample of her work:

Summer Movie Trailers: I Love You, Beth Cooper & Public Enemies

I Love You, Beth Cooper
The trailer for “I Love You, Beth Cooper” might seem a little off-putting without some context. First off, it is based off of a book written by Larry Doyle (a writer from “The Simpsons”). It’s a last night of high school story that was written in a wide-range of obscure and obvious pop culture references, strange math equations, slapstick, but a tender heart at the center. The trailer only seems to focus on the slapstick part of the story. I pray this is merely a typical marketing strategy to attract a younger crowd and not a big studio butchering of intelligent comedy. Nevertheless, Doyle wrote the screenplay for the movie. Hopefully, he’ll stay faithful to his own work because if he does, audiences will be looking at something of a much less innocent, much more awkward modern day version of “American Graffiti.” Trailer below:

Public Enemies
All I can say is that pretty much everything about the trailer looks flawless. “Public Enemies” looks like what might happen if “Goodfellas,” “Bonnie & Clyde,” “The Untouchables,” and “American Gangster” were thrown into a blender. In other words, a film about the somewhat human side of a gangster and a larger-than-life portrayal of a larger-than-life criminal. Most importantly, don’t skip the film because you can’t take Christian Bale seriously after his now infamous, over-the-top rant. If “American Psycho” proves anything, it’s that this man knows how to give a fine performance. Plus, Depp has already impressed once by playing a criminal (George Jung in “Blow”), so I think he can do it again.  Trailer Below:

Movie Review: Away We Go (Early Screening)

At a glance of the poster for Away We Go, you might think it’s a “been there, done that” movie. The poster looks like a rip off of the opening credits of Juno and the poster of Once; all like a typical quirky indie flick. But, look closer (coincidentally, the tagline of director Sam Mendes’s previous film American Beauty) and you’ll find a small gem of a film that’s slow but ultimately refreshing in the current movie market place.

Away We Go begins with a thirty-something couple, in love for many years yet unmarried, finding out that they are about to have their first child. The man is Burt (John Krasinski). Burt never finished college and is currently struggling to make it as an insurance salesman. The expecting mother is Verona (Maya Rudolph), a struggling artist. 
Burt and Verona can barely make ends meet and hope to bring their child up in a better environment. Like a couple of pilgrims searching for a better life, they head out to explore America, visiting friends and family in different cities to ultimately find the right place to live. They travel all over, from the dry Arizona desert, to frigid Canada.
In every city, they meet a series of eccentric characters. There’s Verona’s very profane former co-worker (Allison Janney) in Phoenix and Burt’s hippy cousin (Maggie Gyllenhaal) in Madison, among many others. What the audience learns is that each person they meet has a very different perception of family and a very different view of how to raise children. So as they travel they are not just visiting friends, they’re learning how to raise a family. 
Away We Go’s director, Sam Mendes, is perhaps most famous for his Best Picture winning debut film, American Beauty. American Beauty dealt largely with characters fighting their outer perceptions and eventually learning about the inner feelings of others. Away We Go deals with this theme through a wide range of American culture. Burt and Verona stay with what seems like a peaceful hippy; but she turns out to be an overbearing mother. Meanwhile, their college friend and his wife seem as happy as any couple can be, but they have a dark, underlying secret.
It is not just Burt and Verona however, who are learning new things about other people. The audience becomes sort of a third invisible character and becomes a part of seeing how the characters change as well perceptions of them. Even though Burt seems immature at times and a little lazy we soon realize that he has passion and an extreme dedication to being a parent. Verona’s refusal to marry Burt might seem like a lack of commitment at first but then it turns out to be a testament of love.
One of the finest features of Away We Go is its often breathtaking cinematography. Cinematographer Ellen Kuras focuses on the world around the characters, not just the tiny little bubble they live in. The movie takes its time to show the sun rising over the desert or a shot of the usually bright Miami in a very quiet, dark night.
The movie is bolstered by fine performances. Krasinski retains his hilarious Jim Halpert (from The Office) awkwardness and Rudolph’s very moving performance shows much depth for an actress known mostly for impersonating Paris Hilton and Oprah on Saturday Night Live. Meanwhile, the two brief appearances by Janney, Gyllenhaal, and Jim Gaffigan manage to be brilliant scene stealers.
Away We Go is by no means perfect. It takes time to get into the characters and the road trip story feels somewhat too familiar at times. However, it manages to be so original in that it does something few movies do today: rather than having tragic experiences tear the characters apart, it manages to just keep bringing them closer and closer together and the relationship feel all the more real. Wouldn’t it be nice if every movie treated its characters this way?

Movie Review: Rachel Getting Married

Is it impossible to forgive someone who has hurt you so badly? What if they are family, should you forgive them then? That is an essential questions that looms in the background and drives the plot of the heartbreaking but ultimately spiritually uplifting Rachel Getting Married.

If you thought your family was dysfunctional, then you truly have no idea. The family of Rachel Getting Married makes the Tenenbaums look like the Bradys.
Rachel Getting Married isn’t so much about Rachel. The story focuses on Kym (Anne Hathaway). Kym has been in and out of rehab for ten years and returns back to her Connecticut home to attend her sister Rachel’s (Rosemarrie DeWitt) wedding. Once Kym returns, old family tensions and tragedies are resurrected and the perfect wedding weekend turns into a near ship wreck.
What could’ve been a typical indie flick about quirky and dysfunctional characters is carefully guided away from cliche with a complex screenplay by Jenny Lumet (daughter of Sydney Lumet) and finely crafted direction from Jonathan Demme (The Silence of the Lambs). Even though this movie is a world apart from Silence of the Lambs, Demme doesn’t treat it much differently. Kym isn’t much different from Clarice Starling; both characters are haunted by a tragedy in the past that seems to in one way or another have engulfed their life and their well-being. 
Rachel Getting Married‘s cinematography is like a mini tour de force. It often looks shakey like a home video, other times the screen is covered in a light shade of yellow, other times it gets blurrier as the family’s relationships get more and more strained.
As mentioned above, the movie is not about Rachel, but about Kym. It’s Hathaway’s commanding performance that turns Kym into the film’s most powerful character, as she steals every scene she’s in. It’s a huge contrast for the actress who once starred in Princess Diaries. Kym is no princess; she’s emaciated, bruised, and scarred internally in a way that to most would be an unimaginably harsh pain to ever get rid of. 
Even though Kym is so flawed, Hathaway makes her so likable. She does this by focusing on her strong points and turning her into a human being who is hiding incredible will power and even has a strong sense of humor. If Hathaway continues to play characters like this, she will likely go down as one of the finest actresses of her time. In the future, critics and historians will be scratching their heads over why the Academy snubbed this performance.
Rachel Getting Married is like a double-edged sword: it is both unbelievably heartbreaking yet so uplifting at the same time. That is because it deals with the idea of redemption and the possibility that a person can face one’s demons and overlook anyone’s flaws no matter what and ultimately learn how to forgive. Rachel Getting Married gets this message across without hammering it in the audience’s face; it gets it across by showing simple, relatable human interactions. This is the kind of thing that propels a movie from good to greatness. This is one of the best movies of 2008.