TV Review: Mad Men

Mad Men: A term coined in the late 1950s to describe the advertising executives of Madison Avenue. They coined it.

And here with this very term, “Mad Men” begins. With this very definition, you are about to descend into a new, unimaginable world.
The first shot of “Mad Men” looks like a shot taken right out of “Goodfellas.” It is of a crowded, smoke-filled Manhattan bar in the early 1960s. Era classics play in the background. Slowly, the camera pans to the back of a man’s head. The man sits diligently writing notes. He wears a fancy gray business suit, his hair is slicked back, he smokes a cigarette.
These are minor details one doesn’t necessarily need to know. But this is “Mad Men” and in “Mad Men,” every minor detail counts whether that be a person’s attitude or a man’s tie.
The man being described above is at first shrouded in mystery. He is Don Draper. Draper, played by Jon Hamm, is an ad man, working for the successful Sterling Cooper advertising agency. He can sell products no man you’ll ever see can. In his graceful speeches, he has the ability to turn mere objects into reflections of life, moving people through his words by convincing them that something as stupid as a type of lipstick is the second coming. Basically, he’s a whiter version of Barack Obama.
Although Don is the show’s front and center, “Mad Men” is not merely about him. Instead, the show uses him as a reflection of the change in American culture in the early 1960s. But creator Matthew Weiner uses the world beyond Don as well.
“Mad Men” paints two portraits of the 1960s: office life and suburban life. In the office, Don is surrounded by a multitude of strange and fascinating co-workers. Some include his boss Roger Sterling (John Slattery), who is more or less another version of Don’s chain smoking, womanizing self, Don’s secretary Peggy (Elisabeth Moss), who at first seems like a pre-feminist stereotype, but is truly bursting with energy, and accountant Pete Campbell (Vincent Kartheiser), a WASP who is trying to chose his own path even though his path has already been carved from the beginning.  
Moving on from cubicle life, “Mad Men” explores the dawn of American suburbia. The difference between New York City and suburban home for Don is like night and day. In the city, he’s an unfaithful, partying womanizer. In the suburbs, he is a loyal husband with a typical white picket fence home as well as a wife and two children. His wife, Betty (January Jones), seems like a normal housewife, cooking and cleaning while carpooling for her kids all day long. But she is much more than that. As the show progresses, she yearns to break free from her dull life.
“Mad Men” is about a significant moment in American culture. It balances so many different emotions and yet never manages to be too extreme. At times, it’s dramatic but never over them top. It can be sad but never corny. It’s often sweet but never sappy. The costumes, set design, music, and cinematography so amazingly show off every little detail of the era with stunning perfection, yet, the show is never style over substance. In fact, the substance often lies within the show’s style. 
 The little details, such as a smoky room or an old time automobile, fully engulf the show into the era. Further dragging the audience into the 1960s are all of the pop culture references. One gets to watch how events such as JFK’s election and Marilyn Monroe’s death effected people.
Beyond the sets, costumes, and memorabilia, “Mad Men” boasts one of the best ensembles currently on television. Jones, Slattery, and Christina Hendricks give fine supporting performances but none can match the performance of Jon Hamm as Don Draper. I know I often say that an actor becomes the character, but here, Hamm really does become Draper. Even though Draper is so unfaithful, we often feel sympathy for him. Hamm shows that even though he does horrible things, he’s still a human with a beating heart who still loves his kids andwants to make his family happy. And that, is the essence of great acting.
As mentioned previously, “Mad Men” is a look at two sides of life in the 60s: city and suburban. Perhaps the suburban side is the more interesting side. This is a place where “Mad Men” succeeds where many have failed: to offer a nightmarish, yet realistic view of suburbia. Maybe it’s the for the reason that “Mad Men” is a TV show and can therefore go into much more depth on the issue. While “Revolutionary Road” only had two hours, “Mad Men” has two seasons. The essential question in “Mad Men” isn’t so much about escaping a troubled marriage, but rather trying to make it work. Furthermore, how do you know when your marriage is troubled? And can you fix it, or was it never meant to be?
“Mad Men” is everything you could ask for in a TV show and more. It’s about a generation long ago that isn’t too different from our own. It embraces the spirit of consumerism yet spits in its face at the same time. So indulge, in the most audacious drama your television set currently has to offer. Brought to you by Lucky Strike 

Breaking News: Michael Jackson and Farrah Fawcett Die

Reporting deaths is probably the hardest part of being a journalist.

But today, after a long battle with cancer, actress Farrah Fawcett died. The sex symbol and Emmy nominated actress of “Charlie’s Angels” was 62.
Then later today, shocking news came in that Michael Jackson was brought into the hospital suffering from cardiac arrest. Doctors tried to revive him but he lost all pulse. The King of Pop died today at the age of 50. More details about his death will come soon.
A large portion of my teenage years were shaped by monologue jokes about Jackson’s skin color change, plastic surgeries, and molestation charges. Throughout those years, he was something of a joke, known as the child molester who went from black to white. However, we cannot forget the real reason Jackson became a star: he was the King of Pop. If you think about music in the 1980s, the first name that usually comes to mind is Michael Jackson.
Today, Hollywood lost two of its greatest stars. Music, movies, and television won’t be the same. My condolences go out to the friends and family of both Jackson and Fawcett.
To view Michael Jackson’s greatest claim to fame (still great after 27 years) click here

Movie Review: The Last Detail

Hal Ashby. That’s a name you’ve maybe never heard, but it’s one you really need to remember. He was a prominent director of the 70s who sadly died in 1988 before hitting the age of 60. Among his many great films is 1973′s “The Last Detail.”

“The Last Detail” can be defined as many things. It’s a dark comedy. It’s a coming of age story. But mainly, it’s a road trip film.
The film begins at a naval base. 18-year-old sailor Larry (Randy Quaid) has been sentenced to eight years in a military prison for a minor crime. Officers Buddusky (Jack Nicholson) and Mulhall (Otis Young) are assigned to transport the young sailor to a military prison in Portsmouth. But rather than go straight there, Buddusky decides instead to show Larry a good time before his prison sentence begins. They take trips all throughout the Northeast and engage in some serious boozing, fighting, and sex.
One could argue that “The Last Detail” is really about the things that define manliness. For example, Buddusky thinks that Larry must prove himself by punching him. He rejects, of course. The movie isn’t necessarily saying Larry is any less of a man for not punching Buddusky, instead it questions society’s very idea of what constitutes masculinity.
This movie was made when Jack Nicholson was at the height of his career. “Easy Rider” debuted three years earlier, and “Chinatown” would premiere the following year. He gives a performance in “The Last Detail” that is nothing short of typical Jack. This is not a bad thing, because just watching Jack be Jack is probably one of the greatest pleasures the cinema can offer. His constantly sarcastic attitude is often punctuated by moments of pure, real emotion. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the film’s final minutes.
Also giving a memorable performance is a very young Randy Quaid. He received the only Oscar nomination of his career for this film, and a very well deserved nomination it was. The role of Larry is a tough character to play. Despite the fact that he’s heading to jail, Larry barely fits the standard of criminal. Besides stealing a few small items, he feels more timid than sinister. And because of Quaid’s performance, we look past his flaws and see his better characteristics. Ironically, his transporters seem more fit for jail than he does.
Now, back to Hal Ashby. Ashby is perhaps best known for his 1971 masterpiece, “Harold and Maude,” which bares many similarities to “The Last Detail.” No, nobody dates an 80-year-old woman in this movie. But like “Harold and Maude,” “The Last Detail” follows the formation of unlikely friendships and romances over incredibly small periods of time. During just a few short days, characters mature rapidly and basically live their lives for the very first time. Larry is the Harold of “The Last Detail,” as he learns from his new mentors (this film’s Maude) what it really means to live. And that’s the spirit of an Ashby film, people learning how to get through life.
“The Last Detail” is about people. Very strange people. However, they’re not so strange when compared to the people around them. On their long trip, the trio runs into gun-toting rednecks, Nixon-hating hippies, and worshippers. The film is really about exploring what makes every character so strange, yet so special. It feels like quite an inspiration for many major modern films, especially the recent “Away We Go.”
The fact that a concept so small could inspire so many films shows the legacy of Ashby remains strong. “The Last Detail” proves his legacy: all you need is a good, original idea and some interesting characters to make a movie great.
Recommended for Fans of: Harold and Maude, Away We Go, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, Easy Rider, Rushmore, Dazed and Confused

Tim Burton Gets His Hands on Alice in Wonderland

A few days ago, I wrote a review of the wonderful gem of a TV show called “Pushing Daisies.” I remarked how the show had the distinct feeling of a Tim Burton movie. Now, Burton’s first project since “Sweeney Todd” has been announced: his own version of “Alice in Wonderland.”

Usually, I would groan at the idea of a remake, but in the hands of Burton it will be more like a re-imagining than a remake.
Why do I have so much faith? Burton’s record as a filmmaker, mainly. He recently made his own version of “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.” While it came nowhere near the 1971 classic and no one can touch Gene Wilder’s Willy Wonka, Burton’s new dark twist on the old tale was somewhat moving and well worth viewing.
Like “Charlie,” “Alice in Wonderland” is a fairy tale with very dark undertones (many which have apparently been turning up on “Lost” throughout the years). And who better to find something dark in something light than Burton?
The cast looks fantastic. Alice will be played by unkwown Mia Wasikowski. Burton will once again work with Johnny Depp, who will play the Mad Hatter. Some of Burton’s other collaborations with Depp include “Edward Scissorhands” and “Ed Wood.” The rest of the cast includes Anne Hathaway (White Queen), Burton’s wife Helena Boham Carter (Red Queen), Alan Rickman (The Caterpillar), and Christopher Lee (The Jabberwock).
According to IMDB, the film is slated to be released on March 5, 2010. How do you feel about this? Will this be something special, or just another remake? Me, I’m already counting down the days.

TV Review: Pushing Daisies

Pushing daisies is usually the euphemism used to describe someone who is dead. However, “Pushing Daisies” is not dead, it is budding with life.

Refreshing is barely the best word to describe “Pushing Daisies.” As I said before, “Pushing Daisies” is budding with life, creativity, and a ton of imagination to go around. It is one of the finest TV shows made in years.
“Pushing Daisies” can claim to be a part of many genres. It is mainly a comedy filled with murder mysteries, suspense, and moving romance. It’s a classic Hollywood film wrapped into hour-long installments.
“Pushing Daisies” is centered around the life of Ned (Lee Pace). As a child, he realized he had an extraordinary gift-he could bring dead things back to life. The rules are simple: touch a dead thing once; life. Touch it again; death. Keep a dead thing alive for more than a minute, then something else in proximity has to die. Ned realizes this after reviving his dog, and his mother, only to tragically bring her back to death.
Despite this strange gift, years later, Ned is just an ordinary guy. Holding onto the last memory of his mother, Ned opens a pie restaurant to show off his other hidden talent: pie making. From time to time, Ned aides a private investigator Emerson Cod (Chi McBride) in solving murdering mysteries by bringing victims back to life. One such case involves Ned’s childhood sweatheart, Charlotte “Chuck” Charles (Anna Friel). Deciding he loves her too much, Ned decides to keep her alive for more than a minute. This is much to the chagrin of Olive (Kristin Chenoweth), the pie restaurant co-worker who is absolutely smitten with Ned.
Each episode has a similar format: Normal day, murder mystery, Ned brings body back to life, Ned finds out information, the gang gets themselves trapped in an elaborate conspiracy, they solve it and life is back to normal. Many shows run dry because their premise gets tired, and by this vague description, it might sound like the premise of “Pushing Daisies” would get old after a while. It doesn’t, because each episode the mystery is brand new. Not one murder mystery is ever in any way similar to another.
One could not discuss this show without the word “imagination” constantly popping up. That’s for a good reason. It’s because “Pushing Daisies” has an imagination that most shows today lack. The kind of willingness to put anything on the screen and see what works. In the end, it pretty much all works.
Each episodes is directed like a Tim Burton movie, especially “Edward Scissorhands.” Like a Burton movie, each screen is filled with vividly bright colors serving as an obvious contrast to what should be a very dark mood with even darker themes. In this case, the vivid colors are the bright, yellow daisies stretching in the fields farther than the eye can see.
Each mystery plot is brilliant and could even deserve their own, feature-length films. Like in a “Simpsons” episode, each plot begins very small. Suddenly, one event effects another and a chain of dominos fall to lead to some sort of conspiracy or some sort of all-too-obvious end. Many times, the surprise lies in the fact that the perpetrator seems so obvious that we feel stupid for not predicting it. Other times, more than one person seems guilty and it is almost impossible to guess what will happen next.
At that point, the plot totally has you under its spell. You can no longer predict, it unfolds itself for you. It asks you to open your imagination, yet let it guide you with its own.
Among the chaotic mysteries, the show is first and foremost a comedy. The show gets it biggest laughs mainly from Chenoweth, whose stereotypically dumb blonde attitude somehow increases the likability of her character. Equally hilarious are the wise cracks of McBride.
But maybe what’s so funny all and all is the concept behind the show itself, the idea of someone being able to live the dream of bringing anything back to life, but then having to kill it again after one minute. Funnier also are the many ways Ned uses the gift to his advantage. One such instance will remind you of “E.T.”
Among the comedy and mystery, “Pushing Daisies” also contains some romance. The biggest romance is between Ned and Chuck. They live together, and though it seems like everything should be perfect, but Ned cannot touch Chuck or she will have to die again. And this time, she her death would be permanent. It is those times, seeing Ned and Chuck close together yet so isolated, then at other times figuring out how to touch without actually touching, that are among the show’s most moving moments. It can bring a tear of joy, when they can come closer together, followed by a tear of sadness when you realize they just might not be able to make their relationship work.
It is a chilling aspect of “Pushing Daisies,” to realize that since Ned can neither touch his love nor his dog, he has little solace during tragedy. It adds on to a sort of disconnect with human beings he’s had throughout his entire life.
After two seasons “Pushing Daisies” was cancelled, ending it’s run just one week ago. Many said it was the Writers’ Strike that killed it. Wrong. It was its brilliance that killed it. “Pushing Daisies” was a bright flower just too bright for anyone to understand. It has the right to go up with “Arrested Development” and “Freaks and Geeks” as another great, misunderstood classic cancelled before its time. But hopefully, it will live on forever in the coveted hall of DVD cult fame. I don’t hope it will, I know it will.

The Triumphant Return of Triumph

Last night, Triumph the Insult Comic Dog made his debut on “The Tonight Show” with a video of his visit to Bonnaroo. It’s not quite in line with Triumph’s visit to the Star Wars premiere and Quebec, but it was still no doubt hilarious and even somewhat risqué for the 11:35 time slot that Carson and Leno once inhabited. Keep your ears open for a joke about Scooby Doo. Here is the video (in two parts) below:


Movie Review: Masculin/Feminin

They also could have called this “Brief Interviews With a Series of Various French Women about America, ‘Nam, and Socialism.” But, the film is not just about the women. It’s about the men as well. And the battle between the man, the woman, and the world is the central idea inside this peculiar French New Wave movie.
“Masculin/Feminin,” was filmed in the mid 1960s. As mentioned before, the film was an entry of the French New Wave movement. It takes place among hip bars, back allies, and areas outside of upper middle class homes. It centers around a group of young rebellious men and women of the Paris counterculture.
Like any New Wave film, “Masculin/Feminin” is really plotless. It’s connected literally by a string of sentences, thoughts, and ideas. Of the many characters who come in and out, the film mostly centers around the relationship between revolutionary Paul (Jean-Pierre Leaud) and Madeleine (Chantal Goya), a Beatles hipster pop singer. The film chronicles the years of their rocky relationship through their many interactions with others. And that’s pretty much it; a concept spread throughout 1 hour and 45 minutes.
“Masculin/Feminin” is directed by Jean-Luc Godard with a sense of utter confusion and curiosity. The French New Wave was really a response to the social and political changes of the time, and Godard embodies this fully. The character’s conversations are aimless, not really discussing plot-changing issues, but rather life. They discuss social issues. They discuss the importance of unions. They discuss the importance of coca cola. They listen to French pop. They talk about the Beatles. The film all in all reflects that Post WWII era, a time of a crisis in French pride and a collision of culture. The world of Europe was meeting the world of America.
The sentences, thoughts, and ideas that connect each strand of the story vary. Some involve characters reading lines of poetry. Others express short narratives and anecdotes. Mainly though, the conversations are caught by Paul asking women questions. As he asks, he’s almost always off screen. This makes it seem a little more objective, a little cold, and a little unfriendly. Maybe it’s the way the characters seem more and more isolated from each other under the confusion of culture.
Like in Francois Truffaut’s “The 400 Blows,” Godard dares to focus on the stories of those who are rarely heard. In fact, the characters themselves seem to spend their days trying to stray far away from the bourgeois lifestyles they were born into.
Technically, Godard breaks many conventional rules of cinema in this film. The characters directly address the screen (and are fully aware that they are in a film), there is a movie within a movie, and the soundtrack includes pop songs that come directly from the plot itself. Many seem to believe “The Graduate” was the first movie to use a pop soundtrack rather than a traditional one. However, I believe “Masculin/Feminin” broke that ground first.
“Masculin/Feminin” is not as strangely moving and emotional as “The 400 Blows;” the characters (as well as whatever plot there is) seem a little discombobulated. But despite its small flaws, “Masculin/Feminin” is a great film to admire in it’s pure audacity to disobey every rule of cinema. Ultimately, it’s the ability to sometimes disobey the rules that can really determine greatness.

The President Kills A Fly

This post isn’t really movie related, but it’s about a clip that made it on YouTube. And once you’re on YouTube, you’re fair game.

If you haven’t seen it already, the following clip is of President Obama doing an interview on CNBC. Mid-interview, he is attacked by a pesky fly. I’ll let you see the rest for yourself:

David Lynch: Director, Producer…Songwriter?

David Lynch has a new project on his hands, and it’s one you might not expect from the man.

Lynch, the director behind such strange psychological masterpieces about the lives of average Americans like “Eraserhead,” “Blue Velvet,” and “Mulholland Drive” hasn’t made a film since 2006′s somewhat mediocre “Inland Empire.” Now, he’s back. But this time instead of a movie, he has an album.
Unfortunately, Lynch does not sing on the album, but has written the lyrics for it. The album is called “Fox Bat Strategy: A Tribute to Dave Jaurequi.” The album is named after Dave Jaurequi, the album’s singer and guitarist who died in 2006.
Lynch has described the album as “modern 50s music.” When listening to Jaurequi sing, I am reminded somewhat of Lou Reed during his finest day.
Lynch is known for being able to take anything and put his quirky, authentic stamp on it; crafting movies that no one else would ever think of making. Can he do the same with music? “Fox Bat Strategy” comes out June 30. You can listen to a sample song below: